chromosome

trends & perspectives in clinical research

goBalto Chromosome

Is CRA Turnover a Significant Cause of Clinical Trial Delays?

by Craig Morgan
26Dec2017

Demand for Clinical Research Associates (CRAs), professionals whose main function is to monitor clinical trials, is expected to grow annually by 1.52 percent by 2018. Resulting in many sponsors and contract research organizations (CROs) finding themselves in a never-ending recruitment cycle for qualified CRAs.

Is CRA Turnover a Significant Cause of Clinical Trial Delays?

One of the biggest factors contributing to the global shortage of experienced CRAs is the lack of training opportunities for clinical professionals to begin their careers as CRAs. Many pharmaceutical companies have tabled their new CRA training programs, requiring instead that CROs have experienced CRAs on staff. The experience requirements that sponsors are placing on CROs are in turn limiting the CROs' ability to train new CRAs.

Sponsors only want CRAs that have years of trial monitoring experience assigned to their projects. As part of their service contracts with CROs, sponsors usually specify preferred qualifications for CRAs assigned to their studies. Typically, requiring a minimum of two to four years of monitoring experience, often with expertise in specific therapeutic areas.

Christine Pierre
CHRISTINE PIERRE
President
SCRS
"The CRA shortage means that sites are sometimes faced with absent or under-qualified CRAs. Consequences of this reality are sites report negative impact on study operations, timelines and even quality. Collectively, this reality ultimately impacts all stakeholders."

In an industry plagued by rising development costs and increasing complexities, to what extent is the CRA shortage to blame for the delays in clinical trials? It is fair to say that it is a contributing factor, but it is equally important to point out that well documented bottlenecks in starting clinical trials, such as, protocol amendments, IRB approvals, contract and budget negotiations and others, contribute to significant trial delays and these are not the primary responsibility of the CRA.

According to research conducted by Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (CSDD) most protocols (57%) still require substantial amendments, which leads to significantly longer clinical trial cycle times and higher costs.

Additionally, many researchers have complained that use of different local IRBs to review each research site for a multicenter trial is extremely inefficient and leads to additional cost burdens and trial delays. In a survey conducted by the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) in 2012, principal investigators on federal grants reported that they spend about 42% of their time on "administrative burden", with IRB-related burdens ranking highest. Despite this, many US research sites have been hesitant to use a single, central IRB.

Furthermore, a recent study by KMR Group that analyzed 20,000 contracts found that over a 4-year period contract cycle times have doubled.

CRA inexperience and –turnover can be mitigated using purpose built Study Startup (SSU) technology which provides an intelligent workflow management system to guide clinical operations teams through the clinical trials process with alerts to ensure compliance with country specific regulations and organizational SOPs. Role management ensures workflow continuity during staff turnover and analytics based on operational metrics empowers risk mitigation efforts via the identification of process bottlenecks, which teams can proactively address.

Is CRA Turnover a Significant Cause of Clinical Trial Delays?

Figure 1: Central repository ensures permissioned accessibility and safe, reliable retrieval of documents in the case of CRA turnover.

Though sponsors have largely outsourced the CRA role to CROs (by 2020 over 70% of trials will be outsourced) the challenge is ultimately a shared responsibility. It's critical, that we look at this issue holistically and understand that many of the challenges the industry is facing are completely unrelated to the CRA shortage. However, at a time when protocols are increasing in complexity, competition for patients is on the rise, and regulatory mandates continue to proliferate across the globe, these issues make the CRA shortage feel even more acute.

Article originally published in CenterWatch, as Rising Demand for CRAs, June 2017

Recent Posts