chromosome

trends & perspectives in clinical research

goBalto Chromosome

Improving Minorities' Participation in Drug Trails can Help Reverse Rising Healthcare Costs

by Sujay Jadhav
21Aug2017

The road from the development of a new drug in a laboratory to shepherding it through a series of clinical trials and presenting research findings to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) is a long and expensive one. The costs range from $100 million to several billions of dollars, and the entire process can drag on for more than a decade.

Improving Minorities' Participation in Drug Trials Can Help Reverse Rising Healthcare Costs

Adding to that stress is the fact that all this money and time is spent at great risk to the drug companies and its investors. A product can fail at any point during the testing process, and everything invested up to that point is lost forever. With so much at stake, and ever-increasing pressure on drug makers and the FDA to hasten the development of new drugs, why does a large percentage of biomedical research not reflect the American population? Too often, minority populations are underrepresented, even in clinical trials for new treatments of diseases that disproportionally affect them. This ethnic diversity gap exacerbates minority health issues and drives up the nation's health care costs. The health care industry must make increasing minority participation in clinical trials a top priority.

The nascent effort to remedy this national crisis — and that's not hyperbole — is long overdue. The National Institute of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 requires that all NIH-funded medical research include women and minorities. Even though this act was passed 23 years ago, both gender and minority disparities remain in clinical trial participant populations. US 2015 census data shows that minorities currently make up about 40 percent of the population. However, minorities only represent around 30 percent of enrollees in domestic NIH clinical research.

That statistic is even more discouraging when researchers break it down on the basis of clinical trials aimed specifically at diseases that disproportionately affect minority communities.

According to global pharmaceutical manufacturer Eli Lilly and Company:

  • African-American men are twice as likely as their white counterparts to die from prostate cancer but represent four percent of clinical trial participants.

  • Suicide is one of the top three causes of death among Asian-American women under 45 years of age. Yet, this group constitutes just one percent of trials for potential treatments of major depressive disorders.

  • Mexican-Americans and Puerto Ricans are more than twice as likely as Caucasians to contract diabetes. But those two groups combined only represent four percent of diabetes trial patients.

As a result, it's virtually impossible to determine the effectiveness of a particular medication or medical device because its efficacy can vary widely depending on ethnicity and gender (the gender gap, while not as wide as the one that separates minorities from relevant clinical trials, is unacceptable in many areas). For example, certain blood pressure drugs don't work well for many African-Americans. If there are no African-Americans in the clinical trials, researchers won’t discover those exceptions. The pandemic this lack of knowledge represents is having an immediate and negative impact on the country's health care system.

Without accurate data, doctors cannot prescribe drugs and other treatment options for diseases that affect their minority patients. Without access to effective (and less expensive) preventative drugs they can take at home, these patients will be unable to prevent their health from deteriorating. More will end up in hospitals to undergo much more extensive courses of treatments. Those patients without health insurance will require tax dollars to cover those costs that potentially could have been avoided altogether.

Solving this problem requires us to identify its root causes. First, there needs to be a more proactive and sustained nationwide outreach effort to raise awareness within minority communities. Many minorities never learn about the vital role these trials play, or don't realize they're eligible to participate. Other factors include a lack of transportation to and from clinical sites, and holding trials only in large city hospitals instead of community hospitals. These smaller facilities typically do not have the resources to support clinical trials, but they are where many minority patients seek treatment.

Fortunately, more drug manufacturers and government agencies have begun working to close this gap. The Food & Drug Administration recently launched the first phase of a campaign to encourage minorities to participate in clinical trials. Eli Lilly and The Center for Drug Development and Clinical Trials at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo launched a program to train minority doctors to become principle investigators, based on the notion that recruiting minority physicians to care for minority communities will increase cultural comfort with clinical trials.

Collecting and analyzing information is the key to advancement across all industries. That's why the National Minority Quality Forum (NMQF), a nonprofit research and educational organization, is taking a data-driven approach. It uses its billions of patient records to determine what populations are at risk for particular diseases, such as diabetes, HIV, and hepatitis C, and rare diseases, and their locations nationwide. Sponsors use this data to help facilitate trial recruitment.

There's still a lot of work to be done. The situation grows steadily worse as medicines become more precise and tailored to individual genomes. Increasing the participation of minorities and women in clinical trials is critical to creating new therapies and improving the generalizability of medicine. More companies and public agencies have to throw their weight behind initiatives designed to diminish minority health disparities and to achieve a stronger overall public health benefit.

Sujay Jadhav
SUJAY JADHAV
CEO
goBalto, Inc
Sujay Jadhav, CEO of goBalto, has more than 20 years of experience at leading Silicon Valley software providers, with a life-sciences focus. Jadhav was most recently senior vice president of global corporate strategy and development at Model N, where he filled multiple roles, from corporate development to overseeing their life-sciences analytics and SaaS business unit. His career has also included strategic consulting at Booz Allen Hamilton, product strategy at CommerceOne and general management roles at Singapore Telecom. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of South Australia and an MBA from Harvard University.

Article originally published in Forbes, April 2017

Recent Posts